三级aa视频在线观看-三级国产-三级国产精品一区二区-三级国产三级在线-三级国产在线

OP Rana

GM-tech running agriculture to seed

By Op Rana (China Daily)
Updated: 2010-03-19 06:45
Large Medium Small

To eat GM food, or not to eat: that is the question in China after the Ministry of Agriculture allowed field trials with genetically modified rice seeds. The experts' world is divided.

GM seed supporters argue the world's hungry cannot be fed if agriculture doesn't change its traditional ways (read: if farmers do not use GM seeds). They say if the opponents can accept Bt cotton and genetically engineered medicine, why cannot they accept GM rice.

Let's take China and India, where Bt cotton is grown widely, as examples. GM seeds were introduced in these countries as high-yielding varieties. Very few, if any, farmers were told at the outset that they would have no choice but to keep paying exponentially more to buy them season after season. The Western world, which claims to have gifted the magic seed to the poor, is obsessed with democracy. But after using GM seeds does a farmer have the democracy of choice to revert to conventional seeds? To be honest, he has - but the soil, contaminated by GM seeds, would at best yield a poor harvest.

Thousands of farmers have committed suicide in India because their GM crops failed. They could not repay the loans they had taken from banks and/or moneylenders to buy GM seeds. The lure of GM seeds is still pushing hundreds of thousands of others under insurmountable debts. But they are not part of the West's democracy program.

Earlier this month came a confession from Monsanto, the world's biggest GM seed-maker, that pink bollworms insects had developed resistance to its Bt cotton crop in India's western province of Gujarat.

So what do the farmers do? Monsanto advocates they graduate to using its second-generation product called "Bollgard II which has greater ability (and costs more) to delay resistance". In other words, it is admitting the failure of Bt technology. So democracy means continuing to buy "higher quality" products from the same company and paying more year after year.

Suppose the farmers do buy Bollgard II, is there any guarantee that it would not fail in another few years?

But still the champions of GM seeds want to introduce Bt eggplants in India because it will increase the yield of the vegetable. They have had to back off for now because of public protests, but given India's democratic record they could always return successfully, and one cannot say whether secret trials have already been held with Bt eggplant seeds.

That brings us back to the trial of GM rice seeds in China. It's true that China was the first to grow hybrid varieties of rice. It's also true that hybrid seeds raised output and helped feed millions of more people. India used it, too, with the same results. But hybrid seeds are not, as they are touted to be, the same as GM seeds that multinationals are trying to push down farmers' throats today.

It is surprising that the main targets of GM seed companies are developing countries. Is it because people in the Western world, which engendered GM seeds, are also its greatest opponents? Why do GM seed companies find few takers in the developed world? Why is the European Union still skeptical about GM food? Why do GM companies respect democracy of choice in the developed world and not in developing countries?

Why doesn't an independent study on the harmful effects of GM seeds in China or India carry the same weight as that done by America's Pesticide Action Network (PAN)? Recently, PAN joined hundreds of farmers in Ankeny, Iowa, to "testify to the devastating effects of corporate control over food and agriculture".

PAN presented evidence "from the most comprehensive analysis of global agriculture to date, the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science & Technology", which said GM seeds and industrial-scale farming are unlikely to feed the world; GM technologies have consistently benefited corporations, not the world's hungry; and sustainable agriculture that works for people and the planet requires breaking up corporate monopolies in agriculture.

Let's accept it. GM seeds, in the control of multinational companies, are not science but pure commerce. They are not being promoted to feed the world's hungry, but to make money. These companies have spent billions of dollars to genetically modify the seeds. Now, they are forcing poor farmers to pay them back with a very high rate of interest. Whither democracy?

主站蜘蛛池模板: 黄色在线视频观看 | 黄色淫片 | 好爽~好硬~好紧~蜜芽 | 国产午夜人做人视频羞羞 | 欧美啊啊| 国产成人禁片免费观看视频 | 国产成人夜色91 | 国产美女一级做受在线观看 | 国产精品久久精品福利网站 | 国产日产欧产精品 | 麻豆视频免费在线观看 | 欧美日韩亚洲第一页 | 欧美高清在线精品一区二区不卡 | 一级黄色性生活 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久久无 | 高清色黄毛片一级毛片 | 亚洲免费网址 | 青青草99热这里都是精品 | 国产a精品 | 国产闫盼盼私拍福利精品视频 | 网红毛片 | 97久视频精品视频在线老司机 | 在线精品自拍 | 亚洲美女色成人综合 | 国产麻豆视频在线观看 | 免费精品视频在线 | 精品一区二区三区在线视频观看 | 韩国一级毛片在线高清免费 | 中文字幕在线高清 | 国产精品久久久久久搜索 | 欧美二区视频 | 国产黄色a三级三级三级 | 在线免费看黄色 | 亚洲精品一区二区在线播放 | 精品在线一区二区 | 国产大片线上免费看 | 中文一级国产特级毛片视频 | 一级视频黄色 | 欧美一级看片a免费观看 | 欧美精品毛片 | 国产一区亚洲二区三区毛片 |