三级aa视频在线观看-三级国产-三级国产精品一区二区-三级国产三级在线-三级国产在线

   
 
Apple gains ground in patent war against HTC
(China Daily)
Updated: 2011-12-21

 Apple gains ground in patent war against HTC

Customers try out HTC Corp products in Taipei. Apple Inc still has one other patent case against HTC. Maurice Tsai / Bloomberg

WASHINGTON - Apple Inc won a patent-infringement ruling that bans some HTC Corp smartphones from the United States starting next year, bolstering efforts to prove that devices running Google Inc's Android operating system copy the Apple iPhone.

The US International Trade Commission, in a review of a judge's findings in July, said on Monday that HTC is violating one Apple patent related to data-detection technology and issued a limited import exclusion order that takes effect April 19.

"HTC will completely remove it from all of our phones soon," Grace Lei, general counsel for HTC, said in an e-mail.

The six-member commission determined that three other patents in the case weren't infringed.

While less than what Apple sought, the ruling gives the company its first victory in patent cases designed to slow the growth of Android, which Steve Jobs claimed "ripped off the iPhone". Apple has one other case against HTC, as well as complaints against Samsung Electronics Co and Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc, and is involved in more than a dozen other cases before the trade commission.

"The battle between Apple and Android is going to continue," said Peter Toren, a patent lawyer with Shulman Rogers. "I'm not sure this decision - the way it is - is enough to push the parties to settlement. Apple doesn't have the leverage of a total exclusionary order."

The list of affected products and a full reason for the commission's decision, which is subject to appeal and a presidential review, wasn't immediately made public. Apple's original complaint named HTC's Nexus One, Touch Pro, Diamond, Tilt II, Dream, myTouch, Hero and Droid Eris.

Kristin Huguet, a spokeswoman for Apple, declined to discuss the possibility of a settlement. She repeated the company's position that "competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology".

Representatives from Google had no immediate comment.

The ruling is the first definitive decision in the dozens of patent cases that began to proliferate in 2010 as smartphone makers battle over a market that Strategy Analytics Inc said increased 44 percent last quarter from a year earlier to 117 million phones worldwide.

HTC, the second-largest maker of Android phones, used its partnership with Google to help transform itself from a contract manufacturer founded in 1997 to the biggest US smartphone seller in the third quarter.

HTC generated about $5 billion in US sales last year, according to a separate patent complaint it filed at the trade agency against Apple. That's more than half of HTC's $9 billion in global sales last year.

The commission's order applies to new phone imports and doesn't force HTC to pull existing devices off US store shelves.

HTC phones accounted for 24 percent of the US smartphone market in the third quarter based on shipments, the research company Canalys reported on Oct 31.

Samsung held 21 percent of the market and Apple 20 percent. The market is volatile, and the Apple iPhone 4s that went on sale in October and Samsung's newest Galaxy phone are likely to change the rankings for the fourth quarter.

Apple contended in its complaint that the HTC phones infringed four patents. Administrative Law Judge Carl Charneski in July sided with Apple for two of the patents: the data-detection one and the other covering the transmission of multiple types of data. The commission overturned the judge's findings on that patent and affirmed his determination that the remaining two patents weren't infringed.

Bloomberg News

(China Daily 12/21/2011 page16)



Preventing a patent authorization

Are we able to stop our rivals from obtaining authorization of a patent application that we regard as having substantial defects during the substantive examination, given the fact that the rival companies hane already published their patent applications?

The protection of design on printed flat works

How can a party use hedging to prepare for the risk of infringing?

Can an expired patent be applied again?

What is the difference between a non-compete obligation and trade secret confidentiality obligation?

主站蜘蛛池模板: 免费看黄色小视频 | 成人a级特黄毛片 | 久草视频在线看 | 黑人黑粗硬视频 | 91在线区啪国自产网页 | 娇喘嗯嗯~轻点啊视频福利 | 国产色视频一区 | 国产性生活 | 情侣在线| 婷婷久久五月天 | 欧美限制级在线 | 国产99视频在线观看 | 一级毛片免费视频 | 91精选国产 | 亚洲日本欧美产综合在线 | 中文国产成人精品久久无广告 | 亚洲精品国产成人一区二区 | 国产福利一区视频 | 爱干tv| 亚洲六月丁香六月婷婷蜜芽 | 婷婷色香五月激情综合2020 | 亚洲日韩中文字幕在线播放 | 国产成人精品一区二区三在线观看 | 亚洲呦呦系列视频 | 成年在线视频 | 亚洲福利网址 | 欧美精品blacked中文字幕 | 久久香蕉国产线看观看8青草 | 91福利小视频 | 亚洲综合在线播放 | 日本高清在线不卡 | 韩日中文字幕 | 丝袜美腿国产精品视频一区 | 男啪女视频免费观看网站 | 看看黄色一级片 | 成人午夜影院 | 尤物网在线视频 | 一级片在线免费 | 羞羞影院免费观看网址在线 | 免费国产调教视频在线观看 | 免费在线视频一区 |