三级aa视频在线观看-三级国产-三级国产精品一区二区-三级国产三级在线-三级国产在线

USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
China
Home / China / Focus

AIIB must avoid pitfalls to be effective

By Rolf J. Langhammer | China Daily Europe | Updated: 2015-04-05 13:20

The new Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank should respect transparency and fairness

The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, initiated, headed and for the time being funded by China, enjoys tailwinds from two arguments that are intertwined. One is political, the other is based on economics.

First, politically, the AIIB is seen as a move against the established multilateral pillars of development cooperation dominated by industrialized countries, the World Bank and regional and subregional development banks in all continents.

In these banks, shareholder ratios decide on voting rights. In the Asian Development Bank, for instance, in which Japan traditionally plays a leadership role, China's borrowing shareholding of 6.5 percent, as of 2013, visibly contrasts with that of Japan's non-borrowing shareholding of 15.7 percent. It is globally accepted that voting rights are no longer in line with economic performance and the importance of individual countries for the world economy.

Deep dissatisfaction in emerging markets and developing countries about delayed reforms of voting rights has been one driving factor for the generally positive response that the Chinese initiatives received in pushing for new institutions such as the New Development Bank (often called the "BRICS Bank"), the Silk Road Fund and the AIIB. In these institutions, the industrialized countries are invited to join as partners not as decisive powers.

But political arguments only would not have been sufficient for thumbs up responses worldwide, with the exception of the United States. What ties the political argument to the economic one is the perception that those who pay the piper call the tune.

In fact, empirical studies on decision making at the World Bank support the view that donors (or creditors) often act selfishly in favor of their own political and economic interests. These interests comprise the political partisanship of recipients in relation to powerful donor countries, as well as a high proportion of companies from donor countries represented in the import content of development projects (so-called implicit or explicit tied aid).

Furthermore, traditional donors or creditors in the development banks are said to exert pressure on the focus of development cooperation. Arguably, investment in infrastructure has been neglected by donors, with the result that an annual infrastructure gap of $1 trillion necessary to sustain economic growth has emerged.

If this is true, traditional donors obviously have turned a blind eye to the opportunity costs of neglecting investment in roads, airports, electricity grids or telecommunication networks. If so, why did they fail in identifying the costs of benign neglect, thus missing gains from assumedly selfish loans or grants? Their economic power would have enabled them to secure orders and jobs for their construction companies and to exclude companies from emerging markets and developing countries from making successful bids.

In fact, there are good arguments to question "gap" theories. In the past, they have often proven to be misleading. This holds for instance, for the famous assumption of a savings gap in developing countries as "proof" for the necessity of development aid.

Gap theories are notoriously mechanical, static and extrapolating. They underrate structural change in production patterns, shifts in the competitiveness of locations and changes in productivity of capital and labor. The assumption that infrastructure investment triggers private investment is too simplistic. After German reunification, private investors urged the German government to invest heavily in East Germany's rotten infrastructure as a prerequisite for their investment. The government followed suit but later the private sector shied away from investment, complained about high labor costs, and invested in Eastern European Union member states as being obviously more competitive. Thus, infrastructure investment remained idle.

This is not to deny that infrastructure can trigger private investment but it is by no means a panacea. Nor is the sequence clear. Economic prospects can trigger infrastructure investment. There are other caveats that a new funding institution should consider when concentrating on infrastructure. There is a "cluster" risk with high costs at the beginning because infrastructure projects are often technically indivisible and cannot be sliced up in small portions. Gestation periods are long so that discount rates should be low enough to take future net income sufficiently into account.

And above all, the construction sector worldwide is known as a breeding place for violating fair social, political and environmental standards. It is still a widely closed and intransparent sector protected against international competition and dominated by local companies with strong lobbying power. Thus, it does not come as a surprise that this sector is often subject to investigations about corruption, pollution and exploitation of labor.

Can the AIIB avoid these pitfalls? Yes, with some rules. As the Chinese government already announced, it should subject the AIIB to "best international practices" with respect to transparent and fair standards. It should tap the pool of technical expertise of the other banks and cooperate with them.

Complementarity is the key word. It should not become the hunting ground of Chinese construction companies (being No 3 in world exports of construction services). Tied aid in any form would immediately frustrate the recipients and diminish the economic value of cooperation. Projects should try to avoid cluster risks by dividing them into managable and overseeable modules.

The author is professor and former vice-president of the Kiel Institute for the World Economy in Germany.

 

Editor's picks
Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

Registration Number: 130349
FOLLOW US
主站蜘蛛池模板: 午夜在线精品不卡国产 | 我要看一级毛片 | 国产精品网站 夜色 | 高颜值露脸极品在线播放 | 最近的免费中文字幕视频 | 国产r级| 午夜宅男宅女的免费网站 | 亚洲精品久久久久久久777 | 日韩精品免费视频 | 日韩另类在线 | 美国三级毛片 | 日本精品中文字幕在线播放 | 一区二区三区免费在线观看 | 青青操手机看 | 成人日b视频 | 亚洲欧美一级夜夜爽w | 欧美特级一级毛片 | 黄色美女毛片 | 国产精品嫩草影视在线观看 | 黄色性一级片 | jiucao在线观看精品 | 一级免费黄色毛片 | 亚洲欧美日韩国产综合久 | 成年午夜视频免费观看视频 | 片成年免费观看网站黄 | 久草狼人| 成人在线视频一区 | 黄色一级视频欧美 | 国产午夜精品片一区二区三区 | 黄色的视频免费看 | 真实国语对白视频播放 | 国产淫视| 亚洲一级黄色片 | 国产最新精品精品视频 | 欧洲精品在线观看 | 国产99视频精品免费视频免里 | 视频一区在线 | 欧美精品在线观看视频 | 国产成人精彩在线视频50 | 香港经典a毛片免费观看看 香港黄页亚洲一级 | 在线播放一区二区精品产 |